|Re: higher density cohousing||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lion Kuntz (lionkuntzyahoo.com)|
|Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 00:46:00 -0800 (PST)|
Dear Grace Than you for many good ideas and leads for me to check on. As you response indicates, the possibility of more responses from the first inquiry have not ceased. I have a concept which I feel is good, and worth building. While it is three years in it's current incarnation I feel that the past 40 years were all work leading up to knowing how to do this. I think it was the right choice to not paint a picture and put out a request for comments of a specific configuration, because I wouldn't have learned things I am learning from responders who have answered. I am double-checking, triple-checking, dotting all the "i"s and crossing all the "t"s. The building premise is so dominating that the real goal of housing people in community is not the first item that gets discussed. Where I am going is social architecture -- the building is real enough but it is just the background scenery where 10,000 human dramas will play out over the design lifetime of 100 years service life. The better I do on my part, the more interesting all those life stories will be long after I'm dust. I will correspond further, and thank you for ideas. Lion Kuntz Sonoma County, California, USA __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
higher density cohousing Grace Kim, March 28 2006
- Re: higher density cohousing Lion Kuntz, March 29 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.