Re: Alternatives to sanctions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 08:50:52 -0700 (PDT) |
On Apr 30, 2006, at 5:52 PM, Hans G. Ehrbar wrote:
In the previous discussion about rules and regulations, a recent article from Science was cited as evidence that rule-enforcement by sanctions is a necessity in cohousing. Does this mean that we have to forget about all that touchy feely consensus stuff, since there is no alternative to a policeman knocking at your door?
How did you get from sanctions to dropping consensus? Wouldn't sanctions, or I would prefer to call them consequences of choices, would be decided by consensus in a consensus community?
And in this study, I think the most telling point is that only took a few games for everyone to switch the mode where only those who contributed reaped the rewards. This has nothing to do with sanctions.
Sharon --- Sharon Villines Building Community: A Guide to Creating New Neighborhoods http://www.buildingcommunity.info
-
Alternatives to sanctions Hans G. Ehrbar, April 30 2006
- Re: Alternatives to sanctions Sharon Villines, May 1 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.