Re: Spending Extra Money | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: ken (gebserspeakeasy.net) | |
Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:54:32 -0700 (PDT) |
I didn't know there was such a thing as "extra money".... :) Here's an idea I read from somebody at Twin Oaks and am adapting to your issue. Advocates for different budget items set up booths with information and pitches. Members of the community are given play money and go around to the booths, pick the budget items they support by handing over however much play cash they deem appropriate. This sort of decision scheme would provide a lot more granularity to each member's decision than simply giving each budget item an up-or-down vote. Of course there really doesn't need to be actual, physical "booths" and a specified date/time and place for everyone to partake. A properly constructed web application would accomplish the same purpose and allow all members to distribute their play cash electronically whenever and from wherever there's a net-connected pee-see. phenomenology wrangler and net app gooroo, ken bschaller [at] theriver.com wrote: > At various times I've seen discussion of how to decide how to spend extra > money. I know this can be a very emotional topic and I think it can be > helpful to have a variety of processes from which a community might > choose. Here is a process that I've recently thought of. > > The whole community agrees on certain categories of spending. These might > be related to the various committees which are already functioning in the > community. Additionally, the whole community agrees to the amount to be > spent in each category. Then each committee is given the responsibility > and the authority of deciding how that amount of money will be spent. > Perhaps the community would decide to have special committee meetings for > these decisions and perhaps not. > > The main advantage to this idea is that like items would be competing with > similarly like items. For example, some people might think that a > particular expense is desired for long term maintenance and others may > prefer to spend the money on something that would promote more enjoyable > community building activities. It might help to think of this as similar > to meal planning. We might ask, Do we want to have macoroni and cheese or > a casserole? Or, "Do we want to have cake or cookies?" Or "Carrots or > corn?" But we usually don't ask, "Which of the following are we going > to choose: macaroni and cheese, a casserole, cake, cookies, carrots, or > corn? We think in terms of general categories and I think it would be > helpful to think first in general categories when deciding how to spend > extra money. > > I would be interested to know if anyone thinks this idea might be helpful > to their community or if you think the idea is filled with problems. > > Becky Schaller > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > -- As a statistic, the US Unemployment Rate is like saying that no one is drowning because the flood waters have risen only five inches today.
-
Spending Extra Money bschaller, May 28 2006
- Re: Spending Extra Money ken, May 29 2006
-
Re: Spending Extra Money Mac Thomson, May 30 2006
-
Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
- Re: Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] ken, June 5 2006
- Re: Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
-
Pathways [was Spending Extra Money] Sharon Villines, June 5 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.