Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Trudy Reeves (trudyreeves![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:17:42 -0700 (PDT) |
Some aspects of this policy do not seem all that humane to me. It sounds as if part of the policy came about because someone's cat killed a bird. Is it right to take away that cat's natural instinct? Animals will be animals. I had a cat once that killed a rather large rabbit. I was not happy about it, but it would not have caused me to lock the cat up in the house as punishment. I hope the place where dogs can deficate is close to home. It is not healthy to have to drag them away from doing their 'duty'. Also the excluding of certain breeds of dogs has been contested successfully in court. Hopefully a cohousing community would never resort to that. Even though right now I do not have any animals, I think I would hesitate to join a group with so many restrictions. It seems a bit overdone. Trudy Reeves
-
Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Charles Maclean, June 27 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sharon Villines, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Trudy Reeves, June 28 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Regan Conley, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sheryl Rapée-Adams, June 28 2006
- Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Alexander Robin A, June 29 2006
-
Re: Trillium Hollow Pet Policy - Thanks For All The Input Sharon Villines, June 28 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.