|Re: Clothes Lines||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: eileen mccourt (emccourtCHARTER.NET)|
|Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:26:18 -0700 (PDT)|
Paso Robles, CA has a rule against clotheslines that are visible to the street, which I think many suburban cities do. Since we are in the city limits, we have to follow that rule. Eileen McCourt Oak Creek Commons Paso Robles, CA -----Original Message----- From: Elisabeth [mailto:drite30 [at] yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 10:53 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Clothes Lines I don't want to congest bandwith here with this topic..but.....what is the reason for some communities to not use clothelines? Sorry if it's really obvious!,..I recently have been exploring cohousing as a possibility..thanks is advance.. Tilstra <tilstra [at] smartchat.net.au> wrote: We have quite a few older singles who do not have the equity to purchase their own house in a cohousing development. However, if (some of the) units in a cohousing development are designed with this in mind (eg. an ensuite for each bedroom), it should be possible to offer home co-ownership arrangements (eg. See www.podproperty.com.au ). For example, the 'Golden Girls' set-up appears to have four singles who share a house. Whilst I can't imagine it would be the responsibility of a cohousing group to do the matchmaking, it would lower the financial threshold for joining a cohousing community. What do you think? Hans http://home.vicnet.net.au/~cohouse skype hans.tilstra _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Make PC-to-Phone Calls to the US (and 30+ countries) for 2¢/min or less. _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.