|Re: RESALE VALUE OF COHO UNITS||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Andrew Netherton (andrewnethertongmail.com)|
|Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:06:00 -0700 (PDT)|
Implying cohousing is "bad business" was not the intent of my comment. I was simply hoping that cohousing units sell favourably (good price, quick sell), but not so much so that they invite speculation and simply become another commodity bought and sold for profit. I suppose that's where approval of membership comes in, to prevent such a scenario. Andrew Netherton Laurel Creek Commons (forming) Waterloo, ON, Canada On 9/27/06, Becky Weaver <beckyweaver [at] swbell.net> wrote:
Are people going to build cohousing units because it's a bad business proposition? I was under the impression that there is more demand for cohousing than there are units that are available & affordable. How does something being unprofitable to its creators make it accessible to the average person? Becky Weaver Central Austin Cohousing/Kaleidoscope Village Austin, TX Andrew Netherton <andrewnetherton [at] gmail.com> wrote: Lord forbid that people start building cohousing units because it's a good business proposition. Shudder. _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Re: RESALE VALUE OF COHO UNITS, (continued)
- Re: RESALE VALUE OF COHO UNITS Michael Barrett, September 25 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.