|Re: Quorums/Reopening decisions||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Becky Weaver (beckyweaverswbell.net)|
|Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:20:30 -0700 (PDT)|
Another point about reopening decisions - if a decision is one that really defines your community, and you are growing and working in a way that is satisfactory to your members, consider it a filter for new members. If they can't live with it, your community is not the one for them. And that's OK. Becky Weaver Kaleidoscope Village, Austin, Texas Nikki Sachs <nikkisachs [at] gmail.com> wrote: Hello, We are in the process of deciding.what the quorum for our general meetings should be, the minimum number of members who have to be present to officially conduct business and consense on binding decisions. We are also discussing the same thing in relation to reopening a previously consensed decision to new terms? How many "votes" have to be in favor of this to do it? What have other communities done? Thanks. Nikki Sachs for the process team North Oakland Cohousing, a fledgling urban infill cohousing community in the Temescal area of Oakland CA. _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ ___________________________________ A man becomes his attentions. His observations and curiosity, they make and remake him. --William Least Heat Moon
- Quorums/Reopening decisions Nikki Sachs, October 26 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.