Re: Achieving age diversity | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Michael Whitman (Michael.Whitman![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 07:22:59 -0800 (PST) |
--- Fred Olsen wrote: ...Fardknappen (in Sweden) was developed by people ... "in the second half of life" so it only allows people over 40 who do not have dependants... They DO have an age diversity -- 40 to 90 as I recall. --> Right, Fred: isn't the real discussion of "age diversity" whether of not to have families with children in the community? My bet is that communities for seniors -- no minors in residence -- will increase in demand as more and more people want to age in community instead of aging in the isolation of a single-family dwelling, the way so many of our parents have. These communities will run the gamut from "classic cohousing" to developer-driven communities which may have aspects of cohousing such as a common house and may adopt meals and active self-governance, to senior coops or condos for seniors. I agree that the natural "tendency for children's needs in cohousing to trump elder's needs" exists, as any experienced parent will confirm, and can say with clarity that I as semi-senior really do enjoy the quieter atmosphere that the departure of resident offspring has brought. So doesn't "mit kinder" or "sans enfants" become the significant factor in this discussion, rather than the ambiguous term "age diversity"? Michael Whitman (NH) -- exploring but not yet in a community
- Re: Achieving age diversity, (continued)
-
Re: Achieving age diversity Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 6 2006
- Re: Achieving age diversity Sharon Villines, November 6 2006
- Re: Achieving age diversity Randy Sailer, November 6 2006
- Re: Achieving age diversity Fred H Olson, November 9 2006
- Re: Achieving age diversity Michael Whitman, November 11 2006
-
Re: Achieving age diversity Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 6 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.