Re: question about seniority of "in between" participants | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Catya Belfer-Shevett (catya![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 12:03:06 -0800 (PST) |
Hi Jonnie,On the first two, we subtract any time "out" from the seniority queue. We haven't dealt with the third one.
- catya Jonnie Pekelny wrote:
Hi, folks. Okay: another research question from the North Oakland Cohousing membership team. We will need to come up with a system of seniority, for purposes of unit selection, and I've been thinking about it in the background for the past few weeks. Our group is still new and, for the moment, it's easy enough to simply create a system of seniority based on who joined and paid money first. It's also simple to make a rule that, if a member or associate simply stops being involved and drops out, they lose all seniority. But I anticipate that, as we go on, we will have ambiguous cases that will need dealing with. For example:* A member or associate has to take a sabbatical, but maintains their financial commitments and stays in touch with the group, expressing strong interested in becoming active again when they come back.. Where does the member or associate wind up in the seniority structure, when they come back, with respect to new members who've joined since, and old members who've stayed actively involved the whole time? * A member temporarily defaults on their payments because of financial hardship, but then regains their footing and gets back on track. How is their seniority affected? * A member defaults on their payments and can't get back on their footing yet, but is hoping to be able to in the future, so maintains their involvement as an associate. Where does this put them in the associate seniority hierarchy? And so on. I would be interested in hearing from (pre-move-in) groups about how you handle similar seniority issues. Jonnie PekelnyNorth Oakland Cohousing Oakland, CA_________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
question about seniority of "in between" participants Jonnie Pekelny, November 20 2006
- Re: question about seniority of "in between" participants Catya Belfer-Shevett, November 20 2006
- Re: question about seniority of "in between" participants patjavcc, November 21 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.