|Re: flip tax||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: David Heimann (heimanntheworld.com)|
|Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:10:20 -0800 (PST)|
Hello,Better not use the term "flip tax"! That's how the proposal at JP Cohousing was originally titled, and it was blown dead in the water. It was only after the proponent was willing to call it a "transfer fee" that it began its slow tortuous road to adoption.
Regards, David Heimann (a neighbor of Jeanne's) JP Cohousing Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:48:12 -0500 From: Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at] earthlink.net> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ flip tax To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Message-ID: <070A068D-6A53-45AF-93CD-CE48C329DD5F [at] earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Blows my mind, too! Also in a very good way. I'm interested in this thread for all the reasons stated and hope anyone's community that has considered this will post your experience to the list. One thing I'm curious about is using the term "tax" -- I'm surprised people have not reacted negatively to this terminology. Best -- Ann Zabaldo Takoma Village Cohousing Washington, DC
- Re: flip tax, (continued)
- Re: flip tax Michael Barrett, February 12 2007
- Re: flip tax Raines Cohen, February 13 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.