Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Becky Weaver (beckyweaver![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:26:46 -0700 (PDT) |
> "Intentional neighborhood"? I like your suggested term "intentional neighborhood." To me, it expresses the balance you seem to be working toward, between cooperation and independence. I think people can waste a lot of time arguing over the philosophical implications of calling stuff by one name or another. But there are practical reasons to choose terminology carefully. I think that using the term "cohousing" to describe your plans might get confusing. I do think that the term "cohousing" today implies shared ownership of the common facilities and the resulting HOA or co-op type organizational structure. Becky Weaver Kaleidoscope Village Austin, Texas ___________________________________ This is the true joy of life: being used up for a purpose recognized by yourself as a mighty one; being a force of nature instead of a feverish, selfish little clot of ailments and grievances, complaining that the world will not devote itself to making you happy. --George Bernard Shaw
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing?, (continued)
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Michael Barrett, June 22 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 22 2007
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Michael Barrett, June 22 2007
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 24 2007
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Becky Weaver, June 25 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 22 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Michael Barrett, June 22 2007
- Re: shared meals outside of cohousing Bonnie Fergusson, June 26 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.