Re: SPAM filter | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rebecca Reid (rreid![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:30:49 -0700 (PDT) |
2. Re: SPAM filter on Community's EMail Address? (Marganne)
I found an effective tool for "masking" email addresses on web sites, which prevents so-called spam spiders from finding and harvesting addresses. This was for a local nonprofit whose staff email inboxes were overwhelmed with spam (100+ a day). First, I assumed that their addresses were already on a lot of spammers' lists, so I gave everyone a new address. Then I used a bit of Javascript to replace all the mailto: commands in the HTML on the site. Javascript executes when someone opens the web page; in this case, it "constructs" the mailto: command and email address when the user clicks on the link. The script looks like this: <a href="#" onclick="JavaScript:window.location='mailto:'+'USERNAME'+'@'+'DOMAIN'+'.com'">TEXT</a> Where USERNAME is the part of the address before the "@" sign, DOMAIN is the part just after the "@" sign, '.com' can of course be replaced by '.org' or '.net' etc., and TEXT is something like "To email, click here" or something more creative. When the user clicks on the TEXT hyperlink, it opens an email just like the mailto: command, but spam spiders can't see the address. The only time this might not work is if someone is using a very old version of a browser that doesn't support Javascript, or if their Internet security doesn't allow Javascript to execute. Then I direct them to a non-hyperlinked version of the address, such as username [at] domain [dot] com, and ask them to type in the address into their email program. Michael Dover, Pioneer Valley
Message: 2 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 00:07:21 -0700 From: Marganne <marganne [at] macnexus.org> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ SPAM filter on Community's EMail Address? To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Message-ID: <a0623093bc2aa5e5b3758@[192.168.0.2]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" At 3:18 PM -0700 6/28/07, Fred H Olson wrote:BTW the archives of cohousing-L which makes web pages out of posts "obscure" addresses from the body of messages -- the sender's address is obscured using an image of an at sign. ** If someone requests assistance with their subscription in a way that requires me to "validate" my reply to get around their spam control, I typically take that as indication that they dont want my help very much and I drop the matter... Whitelists are very effective and controlling spam (that is effectively why cohousing-L rarely distributes SPAM), but they are a hassle for new correspondents.SPAM programs at the mail server level and your individual computer level are improving all the time. However, after many years of managing lists and web sites, my preferred way of getting comments is to give out a URL where people can fill out a form. Most fields can be optional, but it lets you find out more about the inquiry if it's filled in and there are no email addresses in the form page for harvesting by Spammers. As long as there are mailing lists that don't go through a web form such as a forum, unscrupulous people will join a list like this just long enough to collect as many email addresses as they can. Another suggestion -- use a 'free' email account when subscribing to an email list or registering at a web site you suspect might not honor a privacy policy. Then, if you start getting SPAM from that email address, you know where it originated and can stop it. Cheers! Marganne ------------------------------ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ End of Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 41, Issue 36 ******************************************* -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.12/878 - Release Date: 6/28/2007 5:57 PM
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.