Re: Changing common elements | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bbstat.ufl.edu) | |
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:12:13 -0700 (PDT) |
normangauss [at] charter.net wrote: > All changes to the property need to be legally consistent. That is > why we have Common Interest Development Law, CC&R's and Bylaws. If > we did not have that, an individuals equity could be refined just > because enough people decided so. If you find a change truly intolerable, then block it. If your block is overruled by a majority vote, then you're functioning in a majority rule system, and 'life, liberty, and property is not safe when the legislature is in session'. Becky Weaver's advice is extremely valuable for effective politicking in a majority rule system. Brian
-
Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 maura deering, September 20 2007
- Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 44, Issue 19 O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
-
Changing common elements Rob Sandelin, September 20 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Brian Bartholomew, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Catya Belfer-Shevett, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 21 2007
- Re: Changing common elements Sharon Villines, September 21 2007
-
Re: Changing common elements O3C11N6G, September 20 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.