|Re: Large animal policies||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousmsn.com)|
|Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 08:06:04 -0800 (PST)|
One of the problems that arises in consensus groups is when people base group decisions on their own belief systems as opposed to the best interests of the group. If being more self sufficient with food is in the best interests of the groups, then vegetarians probably should stand aside when it comes to raising and eating animals. Standing aside is a way to honor personal values without being held hostage to them. A person who stands aside is not asked to participate in the activity or decision being made. People can and do use consensus as a way to force THEIR values on everybody else. Unfortunately it is one of the weak links of a consensus process and it takes a large dose of maturity to understand that your personal values, as important as they are to you, may only apply to you, and that it is unreasonable to expect everybody else to live up to them. Rob Sandelin Sharingwood
- Large animal policies J Boerst, January 31 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.