|Re: Firearms Policy||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: mrbouchez06 (mrbouchez06aol.com)|
|Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:58:29 -0700 (PDT)|
rolling on the floor laughing............... In a message dated 7/8/2008 11:26:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, balaji [at] ouraynet.com writes: The Utah Valley Commons, still in formation, has no policy on firearms, and I would expect that if one develops it will simply mirror existing state regulations. It is unlikely that we would go further, and mandate what someone can keep in his or her own house. In this we may be the exception in cohousing communities nationally. We are, after all, Utahns, and gun-ownership comes close to being a sacred entitlement. Interestingly, in interviewing cohousers here and there (from India to Ecuador, New Zealand to the United States) I find the most controversial policy to be one regarding pets, not guns. That's the one that seems to get people's blood up. For the record, the Utah Valley Commons has no plans to regulate pet-ownership, either. We have yet to decide, however, on acceptable procedures for oxen and other draft animals. With best wishes, Charles Nuckolls Utah Valley Commons -- a cohousing community -- "The Sustainable Alternative to Suburban Sprawl" **************Gas prices getting you down? Search AOL Autos for fuel-efficient used cars. (http://autos.aol.com/used?ncid=aolaut00050000000007)
- Re: Definitions of Residential Density, (continued)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.