Re: not all press is good press | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: S. Kashdan (skashdan![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:07:05 -0700 (PDT) |
A few years ago, one story by a local Washington State reporter about cohousing utilized interviews with people who had left cohousing communities because of frustrations with slowness of decision-making, etc. While I don't think that stories should only have positives, at least to me, that story seemed to emphasize the negatives way beyond their real significance for those who choose to stay in cohousing. In community, Sylvie Kashdan Jackson Place Cohousing 800 Hiawatha Place South Seattle, WA 98144 www.seattlecohousing.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Ullman" <jsu627 [at] earthlink.net> To: "Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [C-L]_ not all press is good press ... I think proceeding with caution with the media is good advice, but I don't think Cohousing can be greatly sensationalized. The worst they might do is drop the project when they find out the common house isn't a bedroom. :-) The best that could happen is that the cohousing message gets out to a lot more people, certainly a good thing. John ...
-
not all press is good press Laura Fitch, July 22 2008
-
Re: not all press is good press John Ullman, July 22 2008
- Re: not all press is good press S. Kashdan, July 24 2008
-
Re: not all press is good press John Ullman, July 22 2008
- Re: not all press is good press Ann Zabaldo, July 22 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.