Re: affordable small homes
From: Caroline (
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
I was very impressed with the very small (350 square feet?) homes by Walt Quade shown on this web site:

I highly advise checking it out. There are several floor plans, including complete cabin, master bedroom and closet only, studio etc. for about $40,000. They look small but very livable... All else you need is land.

I am quite comfortable living in 750 square feet. It's almost too much for one person. Any more would be difficult to heat and keep clean.

--Caroline Skinner / NW Portland

On Aug 18, 2008, at 7:05 PM, Roslyn Hamilton wrote:

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Heimann" <heimann [at]>
To: "Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l [at]>
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ affordable, rental cohousing! (No. Calif.)

Hi Marganne,

Can any of you envision your own community including several
800-square-foot homes?

 I can definitely do so!  Out of 30 units, we have three studios at
550 square feet and three one-bedrooms at 700 square feet.  Of the
remaining 24, eleven are around 850 square feet only. We're doing fine
with the smaller homes!

David Heimann
Jamaica Plain Cohousing

Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:33:08 -0700
From: Marganne Meyer <marganne [at]>
Subject: Re: [C-L]_ affordable, rental cohousing! (No. Calif.)
To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at]>
Message-ID: <a06240809c4cb70417ca4@[]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

In response to Ann Zebaldo's post:

Personally, I think it's important to combine people of many income
levels and circumstances. I have no evidence of this working. Being
someone who lives on the 'margin', it would be a struggle for me to
feel comfortable with only a few community members funding part of a
project integral to the entire community. Perhaps something totally
based on donations would feel more comfortable ... but that's just me.

Please keep in mind that someone choosing to live in an
800-square-foot home (or smaller) is not an indication of that
person's income. This misconception may be part of what makes some
potential cohousing members balk at having homes of different
monetary values in one project.

Many of the smaller homes are highly energy efficient. It's also what
people are looking for who are part of the 'living simple' movement.
A byproduct are more affordable homes.

Perhaps some of you here who live 'in community' currently could talk
about how you would feel if not everyone in your project had the same
buy-in price. How would finances be handled equitably?

Try to imagine several of these 'tiny' homes located in the same
community that has the more common, shared-wall, multi-floor
cohousing buildings. There are links to a few samples below. Note
that these aren't all 400-square-foot tiny tumbleweed homes on
wheels, but they all go for well under $50,000. tiny-house-plans/ goodfit-house-plans/ is the web site of Michael Jantzen who is a
member of the Low Cost Community Housing (LCCH) mailing list. His web
site has links to many excellent examples of smaller, energy
efficient homes. The owner of Tortoise Shell Home also is a list

Making an initial investment to buy a large parcel of land and to
start construction is a problem for people who live on less than
$30,000 a year, even though they can afford to build one of the many
tiny homes available on the market.

Part of the tiny home concept is based on not including some of the
usual functions a 'normal' house might contain. These include a lot
of what cohousing projects share via the common house, a shop with
tools, or a garden.

Can any of you envision your own community including several
800-square-foot homes?


The cohousing, small house movement

Low Cost Community Housing

Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:

  • (no other messages in thread)

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.