|Re: Very Quick Question||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: John Faust (wjfaustgmail.com)|
|Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:09:27 -0700 (PDT)|
No reason not to use it. It already contains quite a few good articles/documents and our forming group has made extensive use of them. I think Rob Sandelin actually contributed a number of those articles. The only drawback is that specific wiki engine. It, like the existing Cohousing US wiki, uses MediaWiki--the same one used by Wikipedia. The editor can be awkward for beginning wiki contributors. A Google Site might be easier to use. It is the reformulated JotSpot wiki recommended by Rob. It has a very familiar looking editor. John On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:28 AM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com>wrote: > > > On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:51 PM, John Faust wrote: > > > The problem is that the members area really isn't a wiki where > > collaborative > > documents are built. > > I think Wiki's are the best way to build information resources, but > why not use the IC wiki? There is a cohousing section. > > Sharon > ---- > Sharon Villines in Washington DC > Where all roads lead to Casablanca > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: Very quick question, (continued)
- Re: Very Quick Question Craig Ragland, August 25 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.