|Re: Low cost community housing group||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Fred H Olson (fholsoncohousing.org)|
|Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 10:08:47 -0800 (PST)|
Lyle Scheer <wonko [at] monkeyhouse.org> is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred, the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> due to a format problem. -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- On 1/23/10 8:09 AM, Tom Hammer wrote: > I am amazed that it is not obvious why the statement below is > offensive. It can be reworded: "people who can afford to buy lower > cost homes are more likely to be dysfunctional." If that is not > classism and dysfunctionality, I don't know what is. > You are correct, I don't follow that. Why can we not entertain the idea that there are more dysfunctional among the poor? This is *not* equal to, "if you're poor, you're dysfunctional," which is what you seem to be equating this to. The assertion is that someone who is dysfunctional (cannot function well in society) is more likely not to have money. This seems pretty logical to me. Certainly not 100%... after all, you can inherit money, not blow it all, and still be dysfunctional. There are quite a few dysfunctional people amongst the homeless. Does that make all homeless dysfunctional? no. However, lack of function does make it more likley that you will not be able to earn much money or have a home. Why is this offensive? - Lyle ~
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.