|Re: balance||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcomeolympus.net)|
|Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:00:15 -0800 (PST)|
The balance I'm referring to is where do you compromise.... and it could go either way. Do you just flip a coin or take a straw poll? Do you try it one way for 6 months and the other way for 6 months? What do you do if there is no clear direction evolving? This is especially hard if there is a clear minority/majority position.
Over time, lots of different strategies emerge. Send it back to committee. Create a task force that includes the various positions and see if they can work something out. We've never done "one way" then "the other", as a tactic. More often there is a proposed action or policy, and some concerns that doing it would not work well. So quite often we use a "sunset clause", and this satisfies those who are uncertain.
A sunset clause specifies a trial period. And VERY IMPORTANT, specify the default! In other words, we'll do X and at the end of a year we'll (a) need consensus to continue it OR (b) need consensus to discontinue it. Otherwise, if the evaluation is mixed, or you never get around to re-evaluating it for some reason, you don't know what that means you should do then.
And sometimes, a proposal simply gets dropped because we haven't found a way to get consent. It might come back some day, or we might just live without a policy, or without purchasing something.
One does the best one can. Consensus is still far far better than majority rule! Maraiah Lynn at RoseWind, Port Townsend WA (about 20 years in)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.