Re: consensus question: what if married owners disagree | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:00:45 -0800 (PST) |
On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Eris Weaver wrote:
A housing unit doesn't have interests, needs and concerns; a person does!
I agree with Eris's points -- just wanted to clarify that we set quorum on financial decisions based on a majority of units represented by at least one member because it is a commitment to pay money.
If non-owners are present, they must also consent. In my last message I said:
a meeting has to have a quorum and there has to be a consensus of everyone at that meeting
That should read "a meeting has to have a quorum and everyone at that meeting must consent."In Roberts Rules of Order, which is the default in many bylaws, a decision-making meeting is defined as one having a quorum. Without a quorum it is not a "legal"meeting.
Sharon ---- Sharon VillinesNothing exists without order. Nothing comes into existence without chaos. Albert Einstein
-
consensus question: what if married owners disagree Jude Foster, February 25 2010
- Re: consensus question: what if married owners disagree Sharon Villines, February 25 2010
-
consensus question: what if married owners disagree Eris Weaver, February 26 2010
- Re: consensus question: what if married owners disagree Sharon Villines, February 26 2010
- Re: consensus question: what if married owners disagree Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, February 26 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.