|Re: Cohousing Weekend - July 16-18 in Conway NH||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com)|
|Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 07:58:23 -0700 (PDT)|
On Jun 26, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Liz Ryan Cole wrote:
a permissible use?
Not sure if "permissible use" is a legal term or not, but from reading this list for ~15 years, many people have gotten zoning variations.
One community in Utah got permission to build on 4 parcels of land by grouping all the houses at the four corners. Which suggests an argument based on the number of houses that would be on the land if it were separate parcels.
CO-HOUSING PROJECT. A residential development or project on one or more contiguous parcels of land, developed by a group of people who define the community as cohousing and who intend to live in the community themselves , designed and built in accordance with the co-housing requirements of Article XIII operated as a condominium, co-op or similar form which allows for individual ownership of each dwelling unit, and including one or more common areas for use by the residents such as a shared kitchen, dining area, library, computer room, laundry, greenhouse, fitness area, play area or the like
COHOUSING PROJECT. A residential development on ________.
Specify the land since you own it and the vagueness sounds like they would be approving this use any where in the town/county. They certainly won't want to do that because it would require a full revamping of their code.
developed by a group of people
Again, too vague. Put in the name of your group and legally incorporate yourselves if you have to.
who define the community as cohousing
If you mention cohousing at all don't call it a community unless that word is a big deal in your area -- is town selling itself that way? There are ways to define cohousing that make it more palatable. "Building Sustainable Neighborhoods" by Mid Atlantic Cohousing is a good small book that presents "cohousing neighborhoods" from the developer's point of view. It would be persuasive, I think, to a planning board.
The pictures are also a good sell. They look like "real" houses and condos.
and who intend to live in the community themselves
Many people build their own houses and request zoning variations of one sort or another (zoning can get really weird). I'm not sure what the wording would be here but it could be better. You might say something like. "Members of the [name of legal entity] are developing the homes for their families.... "
I would suggest paying Jim Leach or Katy McCamet for an hour of their time to discuss ways to word this so it is likely to be acceptable and for approaching the zoning board.
designed and built in accordance with the co-housing requirements of Article XIII operated as a condominium, co-op or similar form which allows for individual ownership of each dwelling unit
What does Article XIII refer to? If they allow condominiums why wouldn't they allow this one? You don't even have to mention cohousing. It's irrelevant to the approval unless there are other issues related to your design and Article XIII.
, and including one or more common areas for use by the residents such as a shared kitchen, dining area, library, computer room, laundry, greenhouse, fitness area, play area or the like
Without figures in front of me I would say that the definition of condominiums now includes common facilities like swimming pools, clubhouses, "party kitchens," fitness rooms, "business centers," etc.
But don't say "shared." Sounds like a commune. Use "available to residents."
Although I just found this fine phrase on a condo description, "evocative communal spaces," which sounds like free love. Check out:
And then there are the neighbors. That's the next challenge. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines"Let us make a special effort to stop communicating with each other, so we can have some conversation." Judith Martin
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.