Re: MBTI personality type | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Chris ScottHanson (emotionsflowgmail.com) | |
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:01:28 -0800 (PST) |
David, Is there a free source for the MBTI? Chris On Nov 14, 2010, at 6:09 PM, David Heimann wrote: > > > Hello, > > The most recent version(s) of the MBTI break down each of the four > types into various subtypes, which I found very valuable when taking the > MBTI again recently. For example, I'm definitely an (I)trovert, yet many > people don't realize it since I active participate at parties and > meetings. However, the "vert" type has around five subparts. On four of > them I come out definitely introverted, but on the fifth type, > "gregariousness", I score definitely the other way. In brief, I do enjoy > being part of groups and sharing my stories and views. However, I share > the key trait with other introverts of (1) my batteries get drained when > mingling with people, and get recharged when I spent time alone, and (2) I > process my thoughts much more effectively by thinking them through myself > and/or journaling then by discussing them with others. > > So, if you feel a bit confused after taking an older version of > the MBTI, take a recent one. It may all come into focus! > > Regards, > David Heimann > Jamaica Plain Cohousing > > > >> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 20:40:46 -0400 >> From: Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ MBTI personality type >> To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> >> Message-ID: <310FD612-ED41-40A3-A8CA-F7708131D133 [at] gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed >> >> We've done this and I personally find it extremely useful. >> >> However, I'd strongly recommend starting with some strong explanation >> that people don't have to share what they don't want to, and also >> that some people might choose to use an "x" in categories they don't >> agree with the test, or don't feel the test is definitive. >> >> For example, I might report XNTJ instead of INTJ because I know that >> I sometimes test as an E. Others might do that just because they are >> uncomfortable with the format of the test. (There are two types of >> people, people who can choose multiple choice answer, and those who >> can't.) (NOTE: That was a joke!!!) >> >> But be sure to make space for people who feel that personality tests >> are not a good descriptor of people. You'll have a happier meeting >> talking about it if you do. >> >> -Liz >> Elizabeth Magill >> www.worcesterfellowship.org >> >> > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >
-
Re: MBTI personality type David Heimann, November 14 2010
- Re: MBTI personality type Chris ScottHanson, November 15 2010
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.