Re: The Future of Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:35:40 -0800 (PST) |
On 6 Feb 2011, at 2:42 PM, Racheli Gai wrote: > > Are the non-residents actually show up to meetings in which decisions > are made? > If they are not, it doesn't seem that they can affect decisions a > whole lot, since consensus > is done by people who are present, no? They don't but they could. On any issue that they cared about, they could object. They could also use their objection on all issues to force us to allow them to extend their leasing privileges. They now have leasees that we like but they don't know how long they can stay in this country. Whether something totally negative would ever happen, one can't predict but it's a situation to be avoided when possible. If a program is being designed to create more rentals in cohousing, it would be best for the local community to have control, not an external agency. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
- Re: The Future of Cohousing, (continued)
-
Re: The Future of Cohousing Sharon Villines, February 6 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing Racheli Gai, February 6 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing Muriel Kranowski, February 6 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing peterpiper, February 8 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing Sharon Villines, February 9 2011
-
Re: The Future of Cohousing Sharon Villines, February 6 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing Naomi Anderegg, February 6 2011
- Re: The Future of Cohousing PattyMara Gourley, May 31 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.