Re: Law free | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Wayne Tyson (landrestcox.net) | |
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 21:56:11 -0700 (PDT) |
Sharon and CoHo:Uh, I thought we were discussing the application of principles to labour rules at common houses in this instance, but you pose a reasonable proposition. Co-housing and condominium do not equate in my limited understanding of the subject, but I don't know why you don't follow that practice. Why would you and why would you not? Is the implication that the homeless should pay the same as a CEO of generous spirit outlawed? I'm talking about volition, but I would, accordingly, deign to dictate. What would the Tacoma have done? Nay, even the fierce Haida!
WT----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon Villines" <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com>
To: "Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 9:28 PM Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Law free
Why don't we apply "law free" to condo fees? Would most people just pay what they think they owe? Do you think that would add up to enough to support the community? Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1204 / Virus Database: 1435/3629 - Release Date: 05/10/11
- Re: Law free, (continued)
-
Re: Law free Wayne Tyson, May 10 2011
-
Re: Law free Muriel Kranowski, May 10 2011
- Re: Law free Wayne Tyson, May 10 2011
- Re: Law free Sharon Villines, May 10 2011
- Re: Law free Wayne Tyson, May 10 2011
- Re: Law free Sharon Villines, May 10 2011
- Re: Law free Wayne Tyson, May 10 2011
-
Re: Law free Muriel Kranowski, May 10 2011
-
Re: Law free Wayne Tyson, May 10 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.