Energy efficient homes (was: Energy demand is the problem) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: ehrbar (ehrbar![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 16:18:36 -0700 (PDT) |
Sharon Villines wrote: > We have two fresh air ducts on our HVAC system for the > large dining room and kitchen of our commonhouse. The > dampers were always open but we only needed that much > fresh air when the room was fully occupied. We asked the > HVAC engineer to wire the dampers and put a switch > upstairs so we could open the dampers when we were > expecting a large crowd but otherwise not be heating and > cooling outdoor air. I am not an expert but here is my experience from recent remodeling. Old gas furnaces are constructed in such a way that they cannot function without allowing large amounts of energy to escape through the flue. It seems modern furnaces are much better (they need PVC or stainless steel flues because of condensation water). Just closing the flue is against code for a good reason; the combustion gases from Natural gas are of course much better than oil or coal but still have very nasty stuff in them, not the least of which is PM2.5 (ultra-fine particulate matter). This is also an issue with gas stoves. Install vents which do not recirculate but go outside and have a powerful fan. 300 CPM (cubic feet per minute) is too little. I found some with 440 CPM in the store I was looking, that's what I picked. When I heard about the health dangers of gas stoves (which of course nobody wants to tell you because profits are at stake), I wanted to replace it with an electric induction stove, but didn't have the required 220 volts in my home. Another energy saving measure which seems obvious but has its drawbacks is tightening up the building, i.e., plugging all the little holes through which air can get through the walls. If the building is too tight, then the outgassing of carpets and paints etc in the building will be a health hazard. Solution: tighten the building and at the same time install a heat recovery ventilator (in arid regions as in SLC) or an energy recovery ventilator when moisture is an issue. All this is much easier with new buildings than as retrofits. If I were member of a cohousing group building now I would insist on following the passive house standards. They are stricter and more relevant than LEED. It increases the original building costs by 15% or so, but I think this will pay off tenfold over the life of the building in energy savings, comfort, and resale value. Finding an architect who is familiar may be the biggest hurdle, but consciousness about this is increasing rapidly. Hans
-
Energy demand is the problem Norman Gauss, July 15 2011
-
Energy demand is the problem ehrbar, July 15 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem Sharon Villines, July 15 2011
- Energy efficient homes (was: Energy demand is the problem) ehrbar, July 15 2011
- Re: Energy demand is the problem Norman Gauss, July 16 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem Sharon Villines, July 15 2011
-
Energy demand is the problem ehrbar, July 15 2011
- Re: Energy demand is the problem Karen Carlson, July 15 2011
- confidence fairies are the problem [was: Energy demand ...] Kay Argyle, July 15 2011
- Message not available
- Re: confidence fairies are the problem [was: Energy demand ...] David Fitelson, July 15 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.