Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (rachelisonoracohousing.com) | |
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:29:43 -0700 (PDT) |
I completely disagree, but am not going to keep this conversation
going, because of the particular
list we are on, and also because I think we're so far apart that no
short conversation is going
to settle anything (and probably no medium-size conversation
either... :))
Racheli. On Jul 15, 2011, at 6:02 PM, Norman Gauss wrote:
Whatever the customer is willing to pay is the true price. If two companies are competing for your business and they sell the same kind of product, theone who can sell it cheaper is worth considering. If you want gasoline, you must deal with the fact that its productiondamages the environment. If one company pollutes less than another but its product is priced higher, you might want to buy from that company. In otherwords, you are supporting that company because you believe in cleaner gasoline production. Norm Gauss -----Original Message----- From: Racheli Gai [mailto:racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 5:09 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Norm,You might be right - if what we're paying is the true price of the product. However, much of the costs are "externalized", and are being paid by us inother ways, including the wars we wage, destruction of ecosystems andclimate chaos, etc. Do we really want it and think it's a fair price? - Notme, and I'm not that unique that way :) Racheli. On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Norman Gauss wrote:Ripping us off can be alleged if we believe that the absolutely essential product we are buying is not worth the money we pay for it. A century ago traveling medicine men would hawk their get-well-quick elixirs from the backs of wagons to unsuspecting people. Much of the time these concoctions were just mixtures of alcohol, sugar and a little flavoring. Most of them were rip offs.But if competing oil companies sell their gasoline to drivers who shoparound and get the performance they expect, it can hardly be regarded as a rip off. Whoever can sell similar products the cheapest gets most of the business. It's called the market, and Adam Smith wrote how efficiently products can be made and sold in a free market. Norm Gauss -----Original Message----- From: Darien [mailto:darien [at] cruzio.com] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 2:00 PM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Energy demand is the problem - Big OilCertainly there is intent to make large profits. Where is the boundarybetween large profits and ripping us off? Darien Payne On Jul 15, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Norman Gauss wrote:We already have an alternative way to generate energy, nuclear power plants. But, as we have learned, there is a downside to that technology. New technologies that Big Oil is using include greater ability to drill deeper and farther out into the water. The humongous expense of getting the oil out of these hard-to-reach places is the end result of Big Oil trying harder and harder to find and extract more oil. When this type of activity declines (it will because it is mining, and all mines eventually decline), gasoline will begin to skyrocket in price. Enjoy the cheap gasoline now because the forecast is for a leveling off and decline of oil supply in the years ahead. Do you believe that there is a conspiracy to rip us off? Norm Gauss -----Original Message----- From: Karen Carlson [mailto:kcarlson2 [at] wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 11:11 AM To: Cohousing-L Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Energy demand is the problem Super huge profits and super huge subsidies obviously haven't motivated Big Oil to invest in new technologies --unless it's still another carbon- based form (e.g. fracking). If non-carbon based, sustainable technologies were on the same playing field as Big Oil, they could jointly produce far more energy then we've been lead to believe. How is it that some cities and countries of Europe are already well down the path of becoming independent of carbon-based fuels?Given the unending handouts to Big Oil, how can other forms of energycompete? To level the playing field, we should consider taxing carbon-based fuel as it comes out of the ground or crosses the boarder and return all the tax money to citizens. This plan (carbon fee & dividend) would off set the additional cost of fuels to poorer citizens and it would build political will to develop new technologies. It would also satisfy the politicians who have signed a "no new taxes" pledge. Karen Carlson Arboretum Cohousing Community Madison WI On 7/15/11 12:02 PM, Norman Gauss wrote:Has it ever occurred to the critics of Big Oil that the profits madeby Big Oil may benefit you and me because they can be used for exploration and development of new technologies so that we can have morecheap gasoline?With lower profits, energy companies are less able to invest in new technologies and to explore for new fossil fuel deposits. Norm Gauss _________________________________________________________________Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/_________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/_________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/_________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Norman Gauss, July 15 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Racheli Gai, July 15 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Norman Gauss, July 15 2011
- Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Racheli Gai, July 15 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Norman Gauss, July 15 2011
-
Re: Energy demand is the problem - Rip offs Racheli Gai, July 15 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.