|rental policy in these economic times||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Lisa Lackey (lisamark-works.com)|
|Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:55:59 -0800 (PST)|
I know I have posted about this subject before, but this is a little different twist. We have a rental policy that only allows 5 out of 34 units to be rented, and if those are filled, then the time limit on renting is 2 years. Which means the poor renters have to worry that they might be kicked out in two years. If I were a renter, I would not want to invest time and energy into the community if I thought I might get kicked out in two years. I personally think we should get rid of the policy, but, naturally, not everyone feels that way. I recently learned that most cohousings don't have a rental policy. So, my question is: if you are in a cohousing without a rental policy, do you regret it? Has anyone run into problems not having a rental policy? Thanks so much for taking the time to read & respond. Lisa -----Original Message----- From: Lisa Lackey [mailto:lisa [at] mark-works.com] Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 2:27 PM To: cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Subject: [C-L]_ rental policy in these economic times Hello cohousing-L- I am writing from Nevada City cohousing, where we are discussing changing our rental policy because of the economic down turn, and I am wondering if there are any other communities that are also making changes or have recently created one. We created a rental agreement which made total sense in the economic climate we were in at the time. The goal is to have long term residents, which seemed to equate to homeowners. Because we understood that situations come up where someone might need to rent temporarily, we allowed for up to 5 units out of 34 (15%) to be rented at a time, and the rental could only extend for 2 years. If the owner wanted to extend the rental for longer, they needed to make a proposal to the Board. The idea was to be able to share the privilege to rent to everyone who wanted or needed to. If someone wanted to leave the community, then they should sell. But, that was at a time when selling was fairly easy. Now buyers are so sparse, that it takes a while for the right person to come along. People can't afford to have their home sit vacant, and it is not helpful for the community to have vacant homes. Additionally, many young families with children simply can't afford to buy these homes. They would like to become long term residents, but can only afford to rent. However, the way our policy is structured, they can only stay for 2 years without being asked to move. if there are other households that would like to rent (& there are). Some members of our community would like to up the number of rentals possible and encourage the renters to become long term residents. There is some controversy as to how that might affect owners from getting mortgages (our legal structure is a condominium, where the percentage of rentals affects the ability to obtain mortgages). People also worry how that will affect community structure and resident commitment to maintaining the common facilities. Some people feel the rental percentage should stay at the 15% level its now, others feel it should go to 20%, others think 30% would be ideal and others think we should get rid of the limit and focus on encouraging long term residence. Is anyone else dealing with their rental policy now? Thanks so much for all your help, Lisa _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- rental policy in these economic times Lisa Lackey, January 31 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.