|laundry machines and remote sensing||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Susan Coberly (susandgeorgegmail.com)|
|Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 09:27:16 -0800 (PST)|
I echo Sharon Villine's response to the LaundryView website. wow. We are a community of 28 homes, of which 24 are occupied; 3 are empty; 1 is soon-to-be-occupied by the owner. All homes have washer and dryer hookups; [stackable]. In the common house, we have 3 washers and 3 dryers, sourced from a leasing provider. 2 sets are stacked. 1 is not. we have room for 4 sets stacked. Of the 26 current households, 2 have washers in their homes but no dryer; and 4 have washers and dryers in their homes. Our community is made up of large and small families with children, most of whose adults work outside the home as well as at home, and families of working-outside the home adults and of retired adults. [each of which type is largely without children though some have resident or visiting children and / or grandchildren]. Our laundry room is very busy, although sometimes it is completely empty. 3/3 seems to be the bare minimum for our community. Even though sometimes someone can/ does combine dryer loads, since we have several households that have a washer only, and since sometimes a washer or a dryer is "down" for maintenance, I would advocate for an equal number of each. With such a small set of machines I am not sure the remote sensing would be helpful but I will mention it to the Common Facilities team. As a general rule the households in our community have more than 1 load to wash and dry at a time, in order to get it done all of a piece. this is especially true of the homes with children, and we have 2 homes with 4 children each, which homes have adults who work outside the home - as well as in the home! We do try to promote the "push your neighbor's waiting laundry forward" cohousing ideal. That works sometimes. Susan C at La Querencia/ Fresno Cohousing
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.