Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: oz (ozozragland.com) | |
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:20:56 -0800 (PST) |
My point is that many who live in cohousing today have indeed made that exact decision. Almost everyone living in our community previously lived in larger homes. In our case, our 1,100 sq ft home included 1/13 interest in a 4,000 sq ft common house. Dividing the 4,000 sq ft by 13 homes yields 307 sq ft of shared space per home. Adding 307 sq ft to the largest Songaia homes (1,800 sq ft) is still slightly small than the median sized home completed in the US (2,169 sq ft. in 2010). On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com>wrote: > > I don't see people who want 2500 or 3000 square feet homes accepting 1200 > except when they were ready to downsize anyway. In our neighborhood, you > can buy a single family 3-4 bedroom house with a yard and a garage for what > our three-bedroom units cost. > > Sharon >
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)?, (continued)
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? Liz Ryan Cole, January 1 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? Holly McNutt, January 1 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? rpdowds, January 2 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? Sharon Villines, January 4 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? oz, January 4 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? Sharon Villines, January 4 2013
- Summarizing - Affordability and Living Cheaper in Coho Mariana Almeida, January 4 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? oz, January 2 2013
- Re: Is Cohousing Cheap(er)? Sharon Villines, January 3 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.