|Re: Consensus and voting bylaws (Willow Murphy)||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Willow Murphy (willowm7gmail.com)|
|Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:36:37 -0800 (PST)|
I like the simplicity and trust suggested by your bylaws structure. I have a concern related to the primacy given or not given to consensus in our community: Our proposed bylaws amendment defines which final decisions are made by voting: ie organizational or administrative structure, finances, choosing board of directors, property interests, legal concerns, etc. Have any other communities defined "voting rights" in this way in their bylaws? Comments? On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:03 AM, R.N. Johnson <cohoranda [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > > Our bylaws are structured such that our consensus process supersedes the > legally required majority voting process unless there is an urgent reason > to do so and we are unable to make a decision by consensus. > Randa Johnson > New Brighton Cohousing > Aptos, CA > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
Re: Consensus and voting bylaws (Willow Murphy) R.N. Johnson, January 11 2013
- Re: Consensus and voting bylaws (Willow Murphy) Willow Murphy, January 11 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.