|Re: We ditched consensus||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Sean Davey (seansonoracohousing.com)|
|Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:55:59 -0700 (PDT)|
just a minor correction, our new system uses super majority voting, 2/3 yes votes are required to pass. We use the same process that we used before for working on a decision: 1) answer clarifying questions, 2) collect concerns, 3) group concerns, 4) attempt to resolve concerns. We've also automated agenda building online: proposals can be submitted by anyone, once 12 people agree to discuss an issue it is moved to a list of agenda items, everyone can prioritize agenda items and for each meeting the agenda is automatically generated based on everyone's priority ranking. if you asked each person in our community why consensus wasn't working, you'd get a different answer from each person. (not everyone thought it wasn't working, a small number wanted to stay with it) for me, a lot of what we were experiencing is covered in Diana Leafe Christian's article: http://communities.ic.org/articles/1565/Busting_the_Myth_that_Consensus_with_Unanimity_Is_Good_for_Communities sean, sonora cohousing > Hi all, > > In case my previous message wasn't understood: Majority rule is now the > method of decision making at our general meetings, instead of consensus > (with a majority rule back-up), which is how we'd operated before. > > I will send in the near future something with more details, since I know that > many communities are struggling, and our experience might be of use. > > Best, > Racheli, Sonora Cohousing, > Tucson, Arizona.
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.