Re: Senior Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: KJ (pumpkin2282yahoo.com) | |
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 07:12:58 -0700 (PDT) |
Excellent news, congrats! Kj Sent from my iPad On Sep 27, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Pat Elliott <pdelliott43 [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > Wolf Creek Lodge in Grass Valley, CA (wolfcreeklodge.org) is built and 26 of > 30 units are occupied with two more in escrow. First member moved in last > October. We are having a fabulous time! > > Pat Elliott > > On Sep 27, 2013, at 5:41 AM, Ann Zabaldo wrote: > >> >> I hope this last clip isn't going to lead to a discussion about the merits >> or demerits of circumcision ... altho' that would be far more interesting >> than urine ... :-) >> >> Like Peter in another post ... unless you have problems in your community w/ >> people leaving the common bathrooms in unsanitary condition and you want >> help w/ that ... let's get back to topics concerning cohousing. >> >> The questions I have right now are: >> >> Does anyone have "firm" numbers on completed SENIOR cohousing communities? >> Names and location? >> >> How about forming or building senior cohousing groups? Names and location? >> >> Needed for an article a colleague is writing about senior cohousing. >> >> Thanks! >> >> Best -- >> >> Ann Zabaldo >> Takoma Village Cohousing >> Washington, DC >> Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC >> Falls Church VA >> 703-688-2646 >> >> On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Holly Wilder wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Reply #3 on:03/02/2009 18:48:02 >>> Squarish triangle is absolutely right; urine is produced sterile but can >>> pick up bugs along the way. However, urine collected from circumcised men >>> is usually also sterile owing to the absence of the foreskin, which is >>> colonised by bacteria at high density. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Holly Wilder >>> Visionary Properties LLC >>> www.visionaryproperties.vpweb.com >>> hollywilder23 [at] gmail.com >>> (303) 517-4180 cell >>> (303) 447-8204 fax >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sep 26, 2013, at 8:50 AM, Lyle Scheer wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Ummm... Urine is sterile. No germs. >>>> >>>> - Lyle >>>> >>>> On 9/25/13 10:01 PM, KJ wrote: >>>>> To continue our bathroom conversation: >>>>> >>>>> True, but it would be hard to actually clean it up, I mean to kill the >>>>> germs, in most public restrooms. >>>>> >>>>> Confession time: when I have accidentally gotten urine drops on the >>>>> toilet seat, I purposely leave it on the toilet seat. You may be >>>>> thinking, how rude! But my thinking was that if I leave it there, the >>>>> next person will a) pick another stall or b) hover as well to avoid the >>>>> urine. I guess I think that if I wipe it off, the germs will still be >>>>> there, but the next person will think the toilet is clean... Am I right >>>>> or am I wrong? >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPad >>>>> >>>>> On Sep 25, 2013, at 1:11 PM, "Wayne Tyson" <landrest [at] cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> CoHo: >>>>>> >>>>>> Maybe so, but should they have to, especially in public restrooms. And >>>>>> if >>>>>> they, and males do happen to have bad aim or splatter the seat with >>>>>> urine >>>>>> and who-knows-what bacteria and contaminants upon the seat, would not >>>>>> said >>>>>> persons have the responsibility to clean it up? >>>>>> >>>>>> If we capitulate to the indifferent segment of the population, does that >>>>>> raise us up or put us down? >>>>>> >>>>>> WT >>>>>> >>>>>> "The opposite of love is not hate; the opposite of love is >>>>>> indifference." --Oscar Wilde >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> From: "Jerry McIntire" <jerry.mcintire [at] gmail.com> >>>>>> To: "Cohousing-L" <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> >>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 6:03 AM >>>>>> Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Designing for Women >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> KJ and others, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Women can pee standing up, it's easy with the P-style. My wife uses it >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the woods. >>>>>>> http://www.thepstyle.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jerry McIntire >>>>>>> stonesthrowcommunity.wordpress.com >>>>>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>>>>>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>>>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>>>>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>>>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>>> >>>> >>>> _________________________________________________________________ >>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >>> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > >
- Re: Senior Cohousing … was Re: Designing for Women, (continued)
- Re: Senior Cohousing … was Re: Designing for Women Ann Zabaldo, September 28 2013
- Re: Senior Cohousing … was Re: Designing for Women Pat Elliott, September 27 2013
- Re: Senior Cohousing … was Re: Designing for Women Ann Zabaldo, September 28 2013
- Re: Senior Cohousing … was Re: Designing for Women Pat Elliott, September 28 2013
- Re: Senior Cohousing KJ, September 28 2013
- Re: Designing for Women KJ, September 26 2013
- Re: Designing for Women Sue Ellen Hiers, September 26 2013
- Re: Designing for Women KJ, September 26 2013
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.