|Re: Bylaws, the law, and Sociocracy||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowdscomcast.net)|
|Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:47:59 -0700 (PDT)|
Our Cornerstone Board was originally conceived as existing only under duress, for titular rubber-stamping purposes. In more recent times, we've begun to feel that's a waste of a good committee, so now the Board has more real functions to perform. The big difference, I think, is that in regular folks' condos, the association rarely meets, while in our coho and others, the association meets in a monthly plenary. Some Sociocrats think this is a waste of valuable member time. Philip Dowds > On Mar 10, 2014, at 3:28 PM, drmaryann49 [at] mac.com wrote: > > The Board is titular (holding a purely formal position without any authority) > and functions merely to rubber stamp decisions made by the group as a whole > in a Plenary session.
Bylaws, the law, and Sociocracy marcia . carlson, March 9 2014
- Re: Bylaws, the law, and Sociocracy R Philip Dowds, March 10 2014
- Re: Bylaws, the law, and Sociocracy Sharon Villines, July 16 2015
- Re: Bylaws, the law, and Sociocracy Fred-List manager, April 19 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.