Re: decision-making process | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Kevin Wolf (kevinjwolf![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 15:11:50 -0700 (PDT) |
Muriel Agreed. That's why a fallback voting process allows the community to decide if a block was valid through a vote. Just the threat of a vote the work needed by the blocker keeps some self-serving blocks from ever occurring Kevin N St Cohousing On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Muriel Kranowski <murielk [at] vt.edu> wrote: > > I am soooo skeptical about how it protects the group process if you make > the blocker explain their objection in the politically correct manner. Any > clever-enough person can come up with a community value to cite for almost > anything unless it is just so transparently self-serving that there are no > words, in which case you probably didn't need to go through the exercise. > Some people really are all about the good of the community whether they use > the right words or not, and some are more about what is good for them, > ditto. > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: decision-making process, (continued)
- Re: decision-making process Richart Keller, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process Patricia Lautner, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process Muriel Kranowski, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process Patricia Lautner, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process Kevin Wolf, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process R Philip Dowds, September 19 2014
- Re: decision-making process Sharon Villines, September 18 2014
- Re: decision-making process Sharon Villines, September 18 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.