|Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com)|
|Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 14:41:28 -0800 (PST)|
On Dec 24, 2014, at 5:31 PM, Kay Wilson Fisk <kwilsonfisk [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2014, at 11:01 PM, Sharon Villines > <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> wrote: > >> 4. Reaction round of 1-2 word responses to determine if > there are any concerns or objections that seem unresolvable > or serious. >>>> t. Do another round to state concerns and objections in > greater detail t: <<< >> (a) refer back them back committee or <snip> > > Thank you, this process looks very helpful. However, I'm > confused at what is meant by the "t's" at both the beginning > and the end of item "t." above. Please clarify. Something got screwed up in copy and pasting. I just posted a better written, clearer version on sociocracy.info I tend to write in email, then on the cohousing.org blog and then sociocracy.info or adeeperdemocracy.info It takes most of the day but the third version is usually the best. http://www.sociocracy.info/moving-objections/ Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Sociocracy: A Deeper Democracy http://www.sociocracy.info
- How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 24 2014
Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Jerry McIntire, December 25 2014
- Re: How Objections Speed Up Decision-Making Sharon Villines, December 26 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.