Re: Launching June 15:
From: Ann Zabaldo (
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Hello all – –

My company tried for more than two years to create a platform similar to what 
you're describing. The technical challenges were too steep to say nothing of 
the finances needed to support something of this magnitude for a market that is 
extremely tiny, tiny, tiny. 

The market has to grow exponentially. More Cohousing will beget more Cohousing. 
 However,  the demographic that wants to live in Cohousing is not necessarily 
the demographic that can actually afford Cohousing at market rates today. 
That's why we need more creative models such is limited equity co-ops or land 

Or better yet we need an entirely new financing stream. As an example, the 
online lending market has gone around standard financing models to create 
lending institutions that can lend at lower rates and with faster turnaround. 
They've done this by going to an investor model which I don't fully understand 
but which is clearly working in the lending industry.

I don't know what the answer is --  I just see the bottleneck. 

It's important to pursue any platform that can connect cohousers with each 
other on any level. However I don't think connection is so much the issue as is 

Ann Zabaldo
Takoma Village Cohousing
Washington DC

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 16, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Corey <corey.birnbaum [at]> wrote:
> Yes, thank you Tiffany, that's exactly what I'm referring to. We need
> something far more robust than email/lists and something more than forums,
> that include maps and groups for finding local cohos, better centralized
> messaging both on the web and mobile devices, and ideally it'd have project
> management abilities for helping people go to the next step of actually
> creating a community. And of course it has to be dead-simple to use.
> These are all features I'm working on, but I'm also working with other
> developers to find common areas where we can collaborate and most
> importantly, share data. I reached out to but never heard a response
> - I'm guessing they didn't think I'm serious, so I'll be sending them a
> demo directory soon, one that makes it easy for different websites to use
> the same data and keep everything in sync.
> Another very important aspect is the willingness to work together. So far
> hasn't been responsive but that might change. It'd be nice to have
> bring visibility to these things as well, like Mary's forum
> and this new website from Carles. If everyone ends up going the direction
> of doing their own thing without reaching out, it's going to get very
> messy. It's fine to have separate tools, but I really hope to have a
> common, robust networking platform.
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Tiffany Lee Brown <magdalen23 [at]>
> wrote:
>> From what I've seen, as a outsider interested in cohousing, Corey is
>> right. If there's a centralized sophisticated technology solution with
>> powerful search capabilities and contemporary app interface, for connecting
>> both current and potential co-housers from many communities, I haven't yet
>> stumbled across it...
>> TiffAny
>> Wannabe-cohouser in Oregon
>> Sent from the far shores of a distant land
>>>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 7:33 AM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] 
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Jun 15, 2016, at 4:41 PM, Corey <corey.birnbaum [at]> wrote:
>>>> I very much see
>>>> cohousing communities in the infant phase in terms of
>>>> networking/communication
>>> Why do you think so?
>>> Sharon
>>> ----
>>> Sharon Villines
>>> Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.