Re: Launching June 15:
From: Corey (
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
...I'm taking notes :)

At the moment it's only passion driving all this, but I think interest will
only grow and eventually we will have to face a reality where money is
involved. It's true that volunteering can only get you so far. I have some
ideas on how to minimize this, but high quality, reliable tech is not free.
However, I do not plan on charging for anything anytime soon (I'm building
it one piece at a time), and I'm hoping donations will help offset server
costs if that becomes an issue.

Ann, there's already a few of us, like Sean ( and Carles ( who have made great tools. We're building for the
cohousing community as a whole, which includes ourselves, but it's the
people looking for and creating communities all over the world, either new
ones or moving to other ones. I think the better tools we have, the more
people we'll attract, especially the younger generations who are used to
slick web apps. But you're absolutely right, money needs to go into it for
this work to be sustainable. I'm curious how that will work.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:46 PM, Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at]> wrote:

> > On Jun 16, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Tiffany Lee Brown <magdalen23 [at]>
> wrote:
> >
> >  Why not make it so the same platform/with a differently branded app
> could be used for developers to start for-profit housing arrangements?
> Why would a developer or a group of developers do this unless they knew
> they could make a profit?  What we lack is research and reliable industry
> figures that current professionals are willing to share so as to draw other
> professionals into the biz.
> >
> > The rationale in this case is to get venture capitalists and/or
> developers to put up the money to develop tools the rest of us need! I've
> spent most of my life in nonprofit, community projects. It does not behoove
> us to underpay our visionaries and workers, or to expect everything to be
> done on a volunteer basis --  this is still how I do many things, but I
> think it lends itself to burnout and limits community leadership and
> engagement to people who can afford to work for free. Not everyone has that
> luxury.
> I agree that we overwork our volunteers to death.   If cohousing is to
> grow, it needs to provide people with an income so they can work in a field
> they love full time and not “hobby” time.
> However, I still don’t see developers putting up the money to develop
> tools “the rest of use will use.”   First of all … who are “the rest of
> us?”  The volunteer folks?  The folks that will  work to create one
> cohousinig community they will live in but not another one?  How does that
> further the movement beyond what is happening right now?   If cohousing is
> to really, seriously take off … it needs a professional group of people who
> earn a living at this.  Development is too big to do part time or with just
> volunteers.   (And God Bless all the zillions of volunteers and volunteer
> hours by paid professionals who have gotten us this far in the movement.
> You are Awesome!)
> >
> > Tiffany
> >
> > Sent from the far shores of a distant land
> Best --
> Ann Zabaldo
> Takoma Village Cohousing
> Washington, DC
> Principal, Cohousing Collaborative, LLC
> Falls Church, VA
> 202.546.4654
> My password is the last 5 digits of Pi …
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.