|Re: Responsibilities vs. Hours||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Muriel Kranowski (murielkvt.edu)|
|Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 13:29:41 -0800 (PST)|
It's been interesting to see the various viewpoints on this. As David Heimann said, you can have "fairness" (= obligation, reporting, keeping track) or "lightness" (trust that people will step up as needed). My temperament inclines me toward "fairness" but my community's inclination has been for "lightness" - what some of our early members called a "loosey-goosey" approach, and they meant it positively. Human nature being what it is, there will be advantages and disadvantages no matter how you do it. We think our way works pretty well for us, with some minor grumbling attached. We have defined a fairly large number of individual workshare tasks that we think need to be done that you sign up for annually, each task being under a committee or subcommittee that theoretically could provide guidance and oversight - I don't know how much that actually happens. A task might be covered by one person or by a small team. There are also 3 or 4 regular and occasional extra work days per year. Many cleaning and maintenance chores - things you need to keep doing every week or two such as mowing our grassy spaces, cleaning the various CH spaces - are done by signing up to do it that week or in a future week, with a task person doing the weekly or bi-weekly recruiting. Other defined tasks handle responsibilities such as maintaining our pedway lights, laundry machines, CH HVAC system,etc etc, that must be done but just occasionally or only as needed. No one keeps track of your work hours, although we set a goal for monthly volunteer hours per household. There is no requirement to serve on a committee or attend meetings. We're in the annual Workshare sign-up period now, and the last "Hey please sign up!" note identified only 3 remaining empty task slots - one for a newly created task, one whose very long-time task person is no longer able to do it, and I forget what the 3rd one was. People tend to stay with their tasks for years, which is good because it builds expertise and a sense of ownership, and maybe bad in that someone else might be better for a particular task but it's taken. Two teams are considered to need specialized expertise and those roles are filled differently, based on a model we got from Laird Schaub. Of course, people can sign up for tasks and then not do them, or not well enough. That is hard to monitor or fix. Last year we created a task for a go-to person who can take complaints about tasks not being done and go talk to the task person, but she didn't receive any complaints. Maybe we haven't publicized this enough, or maybe people aren't comfortable complaining about their neighbors in this way, or maybe 2016 was an exceptionally high-task-performing year :) Muriel at Shadowlake Village, Blacksburg, VA
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.