Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 22:29:36 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Apr 4, 2017, at 11:33 PM, Roger Studley <roger [at] urbanmoshav.org> wrote: > > But I'm not interested in continuing to debate or defend this idea. For > better or worse, Berkeley Moshav plans to try it, and we would grateful to > learn if it has been tried elsewhere and what the experience has been. I don’t mean to make you feel defensive. And trying it is certainly a good idea. There are just things to think about. It sounds like you are open to whatever happens. That’s good because something will. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Roger Studley, April 4 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Sharon Villines, April 4 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Roger Studley, April 4 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Virgil Huston, April 4 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Sharon Villines, April 4 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Dick Margulis, April 5 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Roger Studley, April 4 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Sharon Villines, April 4 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Emilie Parker, April 5 2017
-
Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Fred H Olson, April 5 2017
- Re: Themed, affinity, or specialty cohousing Beverly Jones Redekop, April 5 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.