|Re: Risk Management||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowdscomcast.net)|
|Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:29:29 -0700 (PDT)|
We are dangerously close to splitting semantic hairs, but … When you use the word “you”, I think what you really mean is “everyone" = everyone participating in the process and arriving at the same shared result, so your sentence really goes, “Consent means only that everyone is willing to consent … do not have any objections that would prevent anyone from supporting …” For the purpose of casual conversation, this closely resembles a group that has arrived at unanimity about something, however narrowly it may be contrived. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA > On Jul 13, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > wrote: > > No consent does not mean unanimity or solidarity. Consent means only that you > are willing to consent to the proposal to go forward and do not have any > objections that would prevent you from supporting the proposed action.
Re: Risk Management David Heimann, July 13 2017
- Re: Risk Management Philip Dowds, July 13 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.