Re: Consensus (Takoma Village policy) [was: risk management
From: R Philip Dowds (
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
I sort of agree — but what I’ve found is that most correspondents track a 
consistent subject line even when it diverges from content, so long as they 
think the content is interesting.  When I self-volunteer to change a subject 
line, correspondents tend to get lost, so I leave to others changing the 
subject of a message chain, or else I start a new variant with a fresh header.


> On Jul 17, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Fred-List manager <fholson [at]> 
> wrote:
> --------------------  FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS --------------------
> Shouldn't this be called "consensus decision-making"? Will anyone
> interested in consensus find this thread in the archive by searching
> for "consensus" an the topic be changed retroactively?
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 Sharon Villines wrote:
> ( Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Risk Management )
>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 6:15 AM, R Philip Dowds <rpdowds [at] 
>> <mailto:rpdowds [at]>> wrote:
>> What I hope, of course, is that all others in my group are
>> consenting in the same way.
>> This is what we have consented to:
>> Policy on Consensus Decision-Making Definitions

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.