|Re: Consensus (Takoma Village policy) [was: risk management||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowdscomcast.net)|
|Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT)|
I sort of agree — but what I’ve found is that most correspondents track a consistent subject line even when it diverges from content, so long as they think the content is interesting. When I self-volunteer to change a subject line, correspondents tend to get lost, so I leave to others changing the subject of a message chain, or else I start a new variant with a fresh header. Thanks, RPD > On Jul 17, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Fred-List manager <fholson [at] cohousing.org> > wrote: > > -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- > Shouldn't this be called "consensus decision-making"? Will anyone > interested in consensus find this thread in the archive by searching > for "consensus" an the topic be changed retroactively? > > > On Fri, 14 Jul 2017 Sharon Villines wrote: > ( Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Risk Management ) > > >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 6:15 AM, R Philip Dowds <rpdowds [at] comcast.net >> <mailto:rpdowds [at] comcast.net>> wrote: >> >> What I hope, of course, is that all others in my group are >> consenting in the same way. > >> This is what we have consented to: >> >> Policy on Consensus Decision-Making Definitions
Consensus (Takoma Village policy) [was: risk management Fred-List manager, July 17 2017
- Re: Consensus (Takoma Village policy) [was: risk management R Philip Dowds, July 17 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.