Re: Apartment Sharing Developer attempts to co-opt cohousing
From: Reede Stockton (commercialwillriley.com)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 09:57:46 -0800 (PST)
There is one key element for me that needs to be added to your core concept
of private home, common house and some meals, and that is democratic
self-management.

Reede

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:52 AM, Jenny Guy <jenstermeister [at] gmail.com> 
wrote:

> In marketing my community I constantly (and I mean constantly) encounter
> people who think Cohousing means any kind of shared housing or community.
> Because after all, 'co' just means together. So they're not wrong when they
> say "I lived in co-housing, it was a house with 3 roommates". I explain it
> by saying "Cohousing with a capital 'C' means...".
>
> I wish we had a more distinct name, but it's too late for that, so I guess
> we'll just have to keep explaining. We also could use better ways to
> describe other kinds of communities. We seem to be quite impoverished in
> our language for describing community.
>
> I don't think that trying to hold onto a definition of cohousing means that
> we're inflexible about it, but I do like having a core concept, and for me
> at its most basic it's a community where you have your own private home and
> there's a common house, and some meals. There is a retrofit cohousing
> community in my town with decidedly un-cohousing orientation, but no one
> has objected to calling it cohousing. It has separate apartments and a
> common house and is member managed. So I don't think anyone is being rigid
> about it, just trying to keep some kind of distinction for the sake of
> clarity.
>
> Of course different people will prioritize different aspects, and I notice
> the definition on Cohousing.org doesn't mention common facilities or meals,
> so maybe we are each feeling a different part of the elephant. If Cohousing
> doesn't have to include a common house or even one meal a month, maybe it
> is all up for grabs after all.
>
> Jenny
> Kingfisher Cohousing, Oakland Calif.
> www.BrookdaleCommons.org
>
> On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 7:57 AM, Philip Dowds <rphilipdowds [at] me.com> wrote:
>
> > Coho/US Friends —
> >
> > This definition of cohousing seems more architectonic than it should be.
> > For me, it raises some questions (see below):
> >
> > > On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:09 PM, Lindy Sexton <lindy.sexton [at] 
> > > cohousingco.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Charles Durrett recently sent emails to Carmel Partners, the developers
> > of
> > > the Wellington Apartment Project in Denver, CO, to stop using term
> > > "cohousing" to describe their project because it is not cohousing. He
> has
> > > created a list of criteria, currently specific to senior cohousing, but
> > > which gives the basic criteria that a cohousing community needs to have
> > to
> > > be called cohousing. The criteria include:
> > >
> > > 1.     Co-developed, co-designed, and co-organized with the group.
> First
> > > and foremost the future residents are an integral part of creating the
> > > future community.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at:
> http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
>
>
>

Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.