|Re: Consent question||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Muriel Kranowski (murielkvt.edu)|
|Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 19:57:28 -0700 (PDT)|
We don't have a rule about this. If a proposer were to keep coming back with revised versions of essentially the same proposal, I suppose a committee could decide not to entertain that proposal any more after some number of iterations, but I don't think that's ever been done. More likely the proposer, on being asked to rewrite or reconsider the same proposal a couple of times, would ask to bring up the proposal at a plenary meeting, and we allow every proposal to be brought to the plenary (following our standard plenary agenda setting process). On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 8:23 PM, Chris Terbrueggen <christopher402 [at] gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings , how many committee meetings do you allow a proposal to be > discussed at after it goes back to the author or subcommittee for revision > after the first reading ? I was thinking two meeting would be sufficient > before dropping a proposal , however I learned that sometimes not all > members attend both committee meetings and sometimes it takes two meetings > for members to voice specific concerns or objections to a proposal . Thanks > , Chris > > Sent from my iPhone > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://l.cohousing.org/info > > > >
- Consent question Chris Terbrueggen, June 6 2018
- Consent question Chris Terbrueggen, June 7 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.