Re: Question about Consent Governance | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bartholomew.brianyahoo.com) | |
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 14:37:01 -0700 (PDT) |
> Under these circumstances, what outcome is best for the community? > Failure of the proposal, and acceptance of the status quo? Or, an > over-ride of the remaining objection, such that the will of the > (strong) majority is accommodated in the decision? In one local cohousing-like situation I heard about, the holdout was diagnosed mentally ill. She was legally declared not competent and temporarily imprisoned in a healthcare setting, then the rest did what they wanted. I'm not a doctor, but her behavior sounded crazy to me. Of course, the Soviets did the same thing to dissidents. In another local situation, an owner of desirable land was allowing campfires to escape and become forest fires, and living under an overturned boat. I'm not a doctor, but that behavior sounded crazy to me. Not only was he imprisoned, but his property title and the resulting sale proceeds were stripped from him. That seems too much. What rules do you want followed when you're the dissenter? Brian
- Re: Question about Consent Governance, (continued)
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Muriel Kranowski, August 25 2018
- Question about Consent Governance Sharon Villines, July 17 2018
-
Re: Question about Consent Governance Karen Gimnig, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Kathryn McCamant, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Brian Bartholomew, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Philip Dowds, July 17 2018
- Question about Consent Governance Chris Terbrueggen, July 17 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance Alan O'Hashi, July 18 2018
- Re: Question about Consent Governance David Heimann, July 20 2018
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.