|Re: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 179, Issue 24||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: MJ Phillips (mjphillipspobox.com)|
|Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 07:44:29 -0800 (PST)|
Hi Dick, Look, I didn’t write to this list to get into a debate about the reality of the symptoms I and others experience in the presence of electro-magnetic fields, nor to get into a debate about “risk.” My intention in sharing what I did was simply to include enough context to help others understand my specific questions, and then I offered some links in response to a specific question you posed. In your response below, you make some inaccurate assumptions about my situation and the way I’m thinking about it that I’m not comfortable with. I’d like to ask that we table this dicussion please. Thank you. Jaffy > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:10 PM, Dick Margulis <dick [at] dmargulis.com> wrote: > > On 12/24/2018 9:32 PM, MJ Phillips wrote: >> - Science summaries: >> https://ehtrust.org/science/research-on-wireless-health-effects/ > > Skimmed the above briefly. It seems to me that as with pretty much anything > else we're exposed to, the effect varies with the dose. So if the amount of > undesirable radiation you're exposed to by having a cell tower nearby is > orders of magnitude less than the amount you're exposed to day in and day out > by the cellphone in your pocket, then having a cell tower nearby is weak > reason to reject a community. > > We humans have a notoriously bad intuitive grasp of risk. It's sometimes > useful to look at actual numbers to remind ourselves of where the real risks > are. > >
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.