Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rphilipdowdsme.com) | |
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:31:57 -0800 (PST) |
After a fashion: To participate in a plenary decision-making or consensus, one must be “in the room” and in the moment. No mail-in objections, no votes by proxy. However, “in the room” includes remote video participation. And we recognize that an absentee owner can delegate the exercise of his/her rights to someone bearing power of attorney. We’ve also had situations where where a unit was owned by multiple independent parties — some members, and some not. But we never experienced conflicts or controversies about who speaks for a unit. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA mobile: 617.460.4549 email: rphilipdowds [at] me.com > On Nov 11, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Elizabeth Magill <pastorlizm [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > Isn't this question the opposite? > Does anyone limit the participation of *non-resident* owners? > > Liz
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members, (continued)
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members Mac Thomson, November 11 2020
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members Sharon Villines, November 12 2020
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members Barbara Baatz, November 16 2020
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members Mac Thomson, November 17 2020
- Re: contents of cohousing - non resident members R Philip Dowds, November 11 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.