Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bill Woolverton (bwoolver![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 15:46:47 -0800 (PST) |
They can be used to manipulate the meeting, however consensus seeking behaviour is important regardless of the decision-making method. Bill > On Dec 14, 2020, at 14:08, Tom Smyth <tom [at] tomsmyth.ca> wrote: > > Aren't Robert's Rules bad at drawing out the voices of marginalized people? > They assume everyone feels comfortable speaking up and speaking eloquently, > and that everyone has a strong command of the rules themselves. Those are > some pretty hefty assumptions. But yes, there is some real beauty in them, > I agree. > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 4:57 PM Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L < > cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > >> For the first time I have been reading the full text of Robert’s Rules of >> Order Newly Revised. I have usually read a shortened Cliff Notes version >> that stressed more than anything else the tedious process of ruling on >> which motion supersedes the other and causes discussion to stop, or when >> deliberations can resume, or how votes can be taken in what order and time >> frame. Who has to stand and who doesn’t. All the tricks legislative bodies >> use to fake out a newcomer. Or declare an objection to be out of order >> because the maker didn’t wait to be recognized by the chair. >> >> The newly revised version just came out and we are in the middle of >> revising our Bylaws. I needed to read certain sections to clarify them but >> found the discussion so helpful that I’ve ended up reading most of it. >> >> The Rules are very clear on the following points: >> >> 1. The process of decision making is one of deliberation. Participating in >> the deliberative process is the important part of the process and one that >> makes it better than other processes that only require a vote. >> >> 2. The use of preference ranking/voting is more representative of the will >> of the body than majority voting. But since many constitutions and bylaws >> still specify majority vote it usually can’t be used officially. >> >> 3. They make distinctions between large assemblies and small groups. Many >> formalities are not generally used in smaller groups like boards, >> committees, etc. Others are dropped altogether. >> >> 4. There are large sections of discussion about what a rule means and why >> it is important, and often what it does not mean. This includes discussion >> of how it can be used inaccurately to unfairly to limit discussion or >> participation. Or even to rescind otherwise valid decisions. >> >> 5. I find this very helpful in groups like cohousing which have a >> governance organization organized on a wing and prayer based on the >> abilities and interests of those in residence at the time. Robert's defines >> the roles of the officers and the board in terms of function, address >> alternatives, suggest other combinations of tasks, and give examples of >> additional officers and assistants in large organizations. The result is a >> clear sense of what records and functions an organization needs to maintain >> in order to meet its responsibilities of facilitating the objectives of the >> organization, representing its members, and protecting its fiscal and legal >> responsibilities. And also protecting the rights of the individuals in the >> organization's work—not just controlling them. >> >> In the end I’m finding that we have unfairly thrown the baby out with the >> bathwater in rejecting the whole body of advice because we reject majority >> vote. Robert’s is often said to be designed to protect and promote the >> dominance of the majority. If you read the whole text, its real emphasis is >> on ensuring equal and orderly deliberation and responsible record keeping. >> >> Long way around to enticing everyone interested in governance to read it. >> It’s a Bestseller on Amazon with a 5-star ranking. What better >> recommendation could you have? >> >> https://amzn.to/2WfmEbg >> >> Sharon >> ——— >> Sharon Villines >> http://affordablecohousing.com >> affordablecohousing [at] groups.io >> To subscribe: >> affordablecohousing+subscribe [at] groups.io >> >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________ >> Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: >> http://L.cohousing.org/info >> >> >> >> > > -- > Tom Smyth > > Worker-Owner, Sassafras Tech Collective > Specializing in innovative, usable tech for social change > sassafras.coop · @sassafrastech > Pronouns: he/him > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
-
Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Sharon Villines, December 14 2020
-
Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Tom Smyth, December 14 2020
- Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Yochai Gal, December 14 2020
- Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Ann Lehman, December 14 2020
- Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Bill Woolverton, December 14 2020
- Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Sharon Villines, December 17 2020
-
Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Tom Smyth, December 14 2020
- Re: Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised Fred-List manager, December 15 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.