Re: Moving back from concensus? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Muriel Kranowski (murielk![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 21:26:28 -0800 (PST) |
Presumably good-father was an autocorrect of a slightly mistyped good-faith. On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 12:08 AM Melanie G <gomelaniego [at] gmail.com> wrote: > Again, I am with Sharon. If the goal is expediency aka putting time limits > on decisions and outcomes, it's not actually consensus to me. > > I asked this before Phil, and kind of assumed maybe it was a typo. But > here it is again! Could you please explain what this means? "even after > an arduous good-father effort" I am truly confused by this sentence. > > And thank you for clarifying about the governance models versus decision > making processes Bill. > > melanie > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > >
- Re: Moving back from concensus?, (continued)
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Sharon Villines, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Sharon Villines, December 15 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Muriel Kranowski, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Lyn Deardorff, December 15 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.