Re: Moving back from concensus? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 01:48:20 -0800 (PST) |
Melanie — Sorry to be slow to respond, but Yes, “good-father” was an auto-corrected mis-typing of “good-faith”. In terms of spelling assistance, I think I prefer the old method of the computer underlining what it perceives as an error, rather than silently repairing it. Thanks, RPD > On Dec 15, 2020, at 12:08 AM, Melanie G <gomelaniego [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > Again, I am with Sharon. If the goal is expediency aka putting time limits > on decisions and outcomes, it's not actually consensus to me. > > I asked this before Phil, and kind of assumed maybe it was a typo. But > here it is again! Could you please explain what this means? "even after > an arduous good-father effort" I am truly confused by this sentence. > > And thank you for clarifying about the governance models versus decision > making processes Bill. > > melanie > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
- Re: Moving back from concensus?, (continued)
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Mariana Almeida, December 15 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Sharon Villines, December 15 2020
-
Moving back from concensus? Melanie G, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Muriel Kranowski, December 14 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? R Philip Dowds, December 15 2020
-
Re: Moving back from concensus? Fred-List manager, December 15 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Lyn Deardorff, December 15 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Melanie G, December 15 2020
- Re: Moving back from concensus? Martie Weatherly, December 17 2020
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.